O trabalho na economia de plataforma: oportunidade ou problema?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53660/CONJ-163-312Palavras-chave:
Economia de plataforma, Empresas-aplicativo, Empreendedorismo, Trabalho e empregoResumo
Este estudo apresenta uma revisão sistemática sobre o trabalho na economia de plataforma. O método revela o contexto em que a economia de plataforma se desenvolve, cria oportunidades, atrai participantes, cresce e se consolida. Este novo ambiente de negócios que exibe capacidade de permitir a inclusão de grande número de trabalhadores no mercado; revela-se incapaz de garantir direitos e prerrogativas mínimas típicas dos empregos tradicionais. A economia compartilhada e sua realidade se revela uma opção que rompe modelos e cria oportunidades. Nossos achados revelam que é necessário regular a relação de trabalho na economia de plataforma, além de buscar obter um novo contrato social mais amplo
Downloads
Referências
ABDELNOUR, S. Moi, petite entreprise: Les auto-entrepreneurs, de l’utopie à la réalité. Paris cedex 14, France: Presses Universitaires de France, 2017. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.3917/puf.abdel.2017.01. Acesso em: 9 fev. 2021.
ABUBAKAR, A. M.; SHNEIKAT, H. T. B. eLancing motivations. Online Information Review, V. 41, issue 1, fev. 2017.
ACQUIER, A.; THIBAULT, D.; JONATAN, P. Promises and paradoxes of the sharing economy: An organizing framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, v. 125, C, p. 1-10, 2017.
ANTUNES, R. O privilégio da servidão: o novo proletariado de serviços na era digital. São Paulo: Boitempo, 2018.
ANTUNES, R.; BRAGA, R. (orgs.). Infoproletários: degradação real do trabalho virtual. São Paulo: Boitempo, 2009.
ANTUNES, R.; FILGUEIRAS, V. Plataformas Digitais, Uberização do trabalho e regulação no capitalismo contemporâneo. Contracampo, Niterói, v. 39, n. 1, p. 27-43, abr./jul. 2020.
ARRIETA-IBARRA, I. et al. Should we treat data as labor? Moving beyond free. AEA Papers and Proceedings, v. 108, p. 38-42, may. 2018.
ARRIGO, G.; CASALE, G. Una visión comparativa de los términos y conceptos de la participación de los trabajadores. Organización Internacional del Trabajo (OIT). - Ginebra: OIT, Labour Administration and Inspection Programme. 2010. Disponível em: http://oit.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_dialogue/---lab_admin/documents/publication/wcms_145914.pdf. Acesso em: 30 set. 2021.
ARTUS I. Les salarie´s pre´caires et la code´termination en Allemagne: la repre´sentation collective au-dela` des normes. La Revue de l’IRES, v. 68, n. 1, p. 109-140, 2011.
BERGVALL‐KAREBORN, B.; HOWCROFT, D. Amazon Mechanical Turk and the commodification of labour. New Technology, work and employment, n. 29, p. 213-223, 2014. DOI: doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12038.
BRINKLEY, I. In search of the gig economy. Lancaster: The Work Foundation, 2016. Disponível em: https://www.lancaster.ac.uk/media/lancaster-university/content-assets/documents/lums/work-foundation/Insearchofthegigeconomy.pdf. Acesso em: 9 jan. 2021.
CASILLI, A. A. En attendant les robots: enquête sur le travail du clic. Seuil, coll. La couleur des idées, Savoirs, Paris, n. 2, v. 2, p. 117-121, 2019. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.3917/savo.053.0117. Acesso em: 8 fev. 2021.
COLLIER, R. B.; DUBAL, V. B.; CARTER, C. Labor platforms and gig work: the failure to regulate. Irle Working Paper, set. 2017. Disponível em: https://poseidon01.ssrn.com/delivery.php.2017. Acesso em: 6 jan. 2021.
DAL ROSSO, S. O ardil da flexibilidade: os trabalhadores e a teoria do valor. São Paulo: Boitempo, 2017.
DANN, D. et al. Blockchain and Trust in the Platform Economy: The Case of Peer-to-Peer Sharing, in WI 2020 Proceedings. In: 15TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Germany, mar. 2020. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.30844/wi_2020_n2-dann. Acesso em: 6 jan. 2021.
DARDOT, P.; LAVAL, C. A nova razão do mundo: ensaio sobre a sociedade neoliberal. São Paulo: Boitempo. 2017.
DEGRYSE, C. Digitisation of the economy and its impact on labour markets. ETUI Research Paper - Working Paper, Brussels, p. 3-80, fev. 2016.
DER STANDARD. ÖAMTC präsentierte Drohnen Sicherheitspaket: derStandard.at. 2017. Disponível em: http://derstandard.at/2000062938605/SicherheitspaketOberste- Gerichtshof-warnt-vor-Bundestrojaner. Acesso em: 02 out. 2021.
DEVOLVER, B. Contractual liability of the Platform. In: DEVOLDER, B. (ed.). The Platform Economy, Intersentia, p. 31-87, 2019.
DIEUAIDE, P. Grey zones and triangulation of the employment relationship in globalisation: a business policy approach. Transfer Eur. Rev. Labour Res., v. 24, n. 5, p. 297-315, 2018. DOI:10.1177/1024258918775533.
DRAHOKOUPIL, J.; FABO, B. The platform economy and the disruption of the employment relationship. ETUI Policy Brief, n. 5, p. 1-6, 2016. Disponível em: https://www.etui.org/publications/policy-briefs/european-economic-employment-and-social-policy/the-platform-economy-and-the-disruption-of-the-employment-relationship. Acesso em: 6 jan. 2021.
DRUCK, G. Os impactos da Covid 19 sobre o trabalho. SBPOT TV: Associação Brasileira de Psicologia Organizacional e do Trabalho, maio 2020. 1 vídeo (1:28:02 mim). Disponível em: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3GOVI74vPjU. Acesso em: 27 set. 2020.
EUROFOUND IS AN AGENCY OF THE EUROPEAN UNION - EUROFOUND. Employment and Working conditions of Selected Types of Platform Work. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2018.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Report of the High-Level Expert Group on the Impact of the Digital Transformation on EU Labour Markets. Luxembourg, Eurofound Is an Agency of The European Union, 2019. Disponível em: https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/mk/data/platform-economy/records/report-of-the-high-level-expert-group-on-the-impact-of-the-digital-transformation-on-eu-labour. Acesso em: 6 jan. 2021.
FRIEDMAN, T. L. O mundo é plano: uma breve história do século XXI. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2014.
GARBEN, S. Protecting workers in the online platform economy: an overview of regulatory and policy developments in the EU. European Risk Observatory Discussion paper, European Agency for Safety and Health at Work, 2017. Disponível em: file:///C:/Users/joselia.rodrigues/Downloads/Protecting_Workers_in_Online_Platform_Economy.pdf. Acesso em: 6 jan. 2021.
GARBEN, S. The regulatory challenge of occupation safety and health in the online platform economy. International Social Security Review, v. 72, n. 3, p. 95-112, jul./set. 2019. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1111/issr.12215. Acesso em: 6 jan. 2021.
HANNÁK, A. et al. Bias in online freelance marketplaces: evidence from taskrabbit and fiverr. The ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW) will be held in Portland. Oregon, USA., p. 1914-1933, fev./mar. 2017.
HAVARD, C.; RORIVE, B.; SOBCZAK, A. Client, employeur et salarie: cartographie d’une triangulation complexe. Economies et socie´te´s, Se´rie AB, Economie du travail, ISMEA, v. 27, n. 9, p. 1229-1258, 2006.
INTERNATIONAL LABOUR OFFICE – ILO. World Employment and Social Outlook: trends. Geneva, Switzerland: ILO, 2019. Disponível em: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/---publ/documents/publication/wcms_670542.pdf. Acesso em: 22 maio 2021.
INTERNATIONAL LABOUR OFFICE – ILO. World Employment and Social Outlook: trends. Geneva: ILO, 2021. Disponível em: https://www.oitcinterfor.org/sites/default/files/file_publicacion/outlook_trends_ILO.pdf. Acesso em: 22 maio 2021.
KLEIN, S. Fictitious freedom: a Polanyian critique of the republican revival. American journal of political science, v. 61, Issue 4, p. 852-863, jul. 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12317.
KUHN, K. M.; MALEKI, A. Micro-entrepreneurs, Dependent Contractors, and Instaserfs. Understanding Online Labor Platform Workforces. Academy of Management Perspectives, v. 31, n. 3, jun. 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2015.0111.2017.
LEE, A.; KAWAHARA, T.; SHIKANO, K. Julius - an open source real-time large vocabulary recognition engine. Proc. European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology, p. 1691-1694, 2001.
LEHDONVIRTA, V. Flexibility in the gig economy: managing time on three online piecework platforms. New Technology, Work and Employment, v. 33, Issue 1, p. 13-29, mar. 2018
LENAERTS, H. K.; WAEYAERT, W. A economia de plataforma e trabalho precário. Publicação para o comitê sobre Emprego e Assuntos Sociais, Departamento de Políticas Econômicas, Científicas e de Qualidade de Vida, Parlamento Europeu, Luxemburgo, 2020. Disponível em: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2020/652734/IPOL_STU(2020)652734_EN.pdf. Acesso em: 30 set. 2021.
LOBEL, O. The law of the platform. Minnesota Law Review 137, 2016. Disponível em: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1136&context=mlr. Acesso em: 25 maio 2021.
McAFEE, A.; BRYNJOLFSSON, E. The second machine age: work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. London: W.W. Norton e Company, 2014.
MOORE, P. The quantified self in precarity: work, technology, and what counts. London: Routledge, 2018.
PARKER, G. G.; VAN ALSTYNE, M.W.; CHOUNDARY, S. P. Platform revolution. How networked markets are transforming the economy and how to make them work for you. W.W. Norton & Company, Inc., New York, 336 s. 2016.
ROSENBLAT, A. The truth about how uber’s app manages drivers. Harvard Business Review, apr. 2016. Disponível em: https://hbr.org/2016/04/the-truth-about-how-ubers-app-manages-drivers. Acesso em: 12 jan. 2021.
ROSENBLAT, A.; STARK, L. Algorithmic labor and information asymmetries: a case study of uber’s drivers. International Journal of Communication, v. 10, n. 27, 2016. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2686227.
SPREITZER, G. M.; CAMERON, L.; GARRETT, L. Alternative Work Arrangements: Two Images of the New World of Work. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, v. 4, n. 1, p. 473-499, 2017.
SRNICEK, N. Platform capitalism. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. 2017.
STANDING, G. Global labour flexibility: seeking distributive justice. Nova York: St Martin’s Press, 1999.
STANDING, G. The Precariat: the new dangerous class. USA: Bloomsbury, 2011.
STANDING, G. O principal inimigo do precariado é o Estado. In: O Estado de São Paulo, especial Trabalho. 2017a. https://infograficos.estadao.com.br/focas/planeje-sua-vida/principal-inimigo-do-precariado-e-o-estado-diz-economista-britanico. Acesso em: 30 set. 2020.
STANDING, G. Basic Income: and how we can make it happen. Lauro de Freitas: Editora Pelicano. 2017b.
STROWEL, A.; VERGOTE, W. Digital Platform: to regulate or not to regulate? In: DEVOLDER, B. The Platform Economy. Intersentia, 2019, pp. 1-30
SUNDARARAJAN, A. The sharing economy: the end of employment and the rise of gig-based capitalism. London: MIT Press. 2016.
TIPPETT, E. C. Employee Classification in the Sharing Economy. Cambridge Handbook of Law and Regulation of the Sharing Economy, Forthcoming, 2017. Disponível em: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3009943.2017. Acesso em: 8 jan. 2021.
TIROLE, J. Economie du bien commun, Paris, PUF. RIMHE: Revue Interdisciplinaire Management, Homme & Entreprise, v. 4, n. 4, p. 101-105, 2018. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.3917/rimhe.023.0101. Acesso em: 9 fev. 2021.
VALENDUC, G.; VENDRAMIN, P. Work in the digital economy: sorting the old from the new. Working Paper, Brussels, 2016.
WOOD, A. J. et al. Good gig, bad gig: autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy. Work, Employment and Society, v. 33, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017018785616.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2021 Conjecturas
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
